Get started for free
>
>

Review Assistant - Code Review Tool

Free

Review Assistant is a lightweight peer code review add-in for Visual Studio 2010/2012, which integrates with popular control systems namely: TFS, Subversion, Mercurial and Git. Review Assistant allows users to add comments to a piece of code.

(5) Review
Visual Studio
2012, 2010
Get Now (6,058)
5/13/2013
1.2
E-mail Twitter del.icio.us Digg Facebook
Add To Favorites
Description
Reviews (5)
Q and A (3)
Sign in to Write a Review
Sort By:

by bmv74 | April 25 2013

Really nice and useful tool

by Reneaimececi | April 23 2013

Good, but not free exactly... hope the free version can support at least 5 members...
And, Review Assistant can't export any review report? or some statistics results?

Devart Software May 07 2013
| Edit |
Delete

Unfortunately Review Assistant does not generate any reports presently. Please, vote for this suggestion at UserVoice in order for us to create a list of features that are most needed by our users: http://devart.uservoice.com/forums/145340-review-assistant/suggestions/3478370-please-add-metrics-and-reporting
You can as well suggest to expand the limit of users in the free version and this suggestion will surely be considered.

by Bryan Naegele | November 29 2012

We used Review Assistant on a trial basis with a small team and immediately purchased a license for the whole company when it was over. With Review Assistant, you can have code review for a tiny fraction of the cost to outfit your entire company with Premium+ licenses for this essential ability. I don't know why MS decided to require Premium+ to get code review, but this definitely fills the void. Great product. Simple setup. I am excited to see what comes in future releases.

Devart Software January 24 2013
| Edit |
Delete

Hello Bryan, we would like to place your feedback on our website, can you please contact us via the email - marinanatdevartdotcom , so that we could settle all the details. Sorry for contacting you this way, but unfortunately we haven't found your contact information.

by David.Feldman | September 18 2012

We setup the review assistant up to work with a small set of developers. At first there seem to be problems with the search functionality but now it seems fine. I do not know if it was fixed or an environment problem. In either case it resolved a big issue I was having with having with the tool.

Combined with code compare and running review assistent on the tfs server, it provides a good way to share code and comments amount our team. For us it would be nice if it provided the ability to print and store a report on the review. For example: The report could list moderator, author, changeset reviewed, files changed, review comments and defects. However, I understand that this is beyond the scope of the tool.

Devart Software September 20 2012
| Edit |
Delete

Hello David,

In the latest version of Review Assistant (1.0.26) we added search by changeset numbers and by name of review participant.

As for the reports, feel free to add this improvement at http://devart.uservoice.com/forums/145340-review-assistant/. If it gets enough votes, we will implement it in one of the next versions.

by learnerplates | September 17 2012

Sign in to Start a Discussion

  • Reply to Discussion | Hide
    Problem with Review Comment
    2 Posts | Last Post December 20, 2012
    • Written December 19, 2012 
      Hello,

When i try use the "Add Review Comment" a receive the follow message error:
 
"Cannot add comment to this document.
This file doesn't belong to any repository of the current Review Assistant Project"


The type of my repositorie is Custom.
    • Written December 20, 2012 
      Hello, 
You may be misled that Review Assistant allows you to add a file to review, which does not belong to the repositories folder - it is a minor bug and it will be fixed in the next version. Review Assistant allows to add comments only for files, that are within the repository of review that you choose in Code Review Board or within any repository of the project in the case when you choose ad-hoc comments. If you see another behavior, please, let us know.
  • Reply to Discussion | Hide
    Multiple TFS Changesets
    2 Posts | Last Post September 20, 2012
    • Written September 10, 2012 
      When selecting multiple changesets from TFS for a review from an author where the changesets aren't necessarily in sequence (i.e. some other people checked in between some of the changesets) Review Assistant currently seems to include all the changes from the other people who checked in as well.  The only way to get around this is then to manually delete all the other files which is obviously a great pain.
    • Written September 20, 2012 
      Hello Carel,

This problem was fixed in the latest version of  Review Assistant (1.0.26).
Feel free to report any problem that you find. We will try to resolve it promptly.
  • Reply to Discussion | Hide
    Search feature
    3 Posts | Last Post September 20, 2012
    • Written August 17, 2012 
      My biggest problem with this tool is that there seems to be only limited search capacity. My first issue is that the keyword search does not seem to work as advertised.  When I type in a key word all my reviews disappear even when there is clearly a match.  The search on review id works as long as you know your id but it also means all searches enterred starting with a numeric value are interpreted as a review id even when you are intending to search on a changeset value.  My biggest problem is that I cannot search on changeset (revision) values.  This is a big deal for our process which requires review records for each changeset submitted.
    • Written August 22, 2012 
      We are planning to support the search of numeric values in the next build of Review Assistant.
    • Written September 20, 2012 
      Hello David,

In the latest version of Review Assistant (1.0.26) we added search by changeset numbers and by name of review participant.

As for the reports, feel free to add this improvement at http://devart.uservoice.com/forums/145340-review-assistant/. If it gets enough votes, we will implement it in one of the next versions.